Shanghai AI Lab Diagnoses Agent Failures
Shanghai AI Lab’s study evaluates 111 model–harness configurations across six benchmarks and 52,168 trajectories, introducing metrics that separate model capability from execution-layer reliability. It finds harness rankings vary substantially by model and task, with OpenCode leading cross-model performance.
Agent benchmarks have been quietly measuring scaffolding as much as intelligence; this framework gives developers a better way to identify what actually broke.
- –Valid Completion Rate distinguishes execution failures from incorrect answers.
- –Model–harness fit exposes pairings that aggregate benchmark scores hide.
- –Token Load makes inefficient retries, timeouts, and failed attempts visible as cost drivers.
- –Results suggest there is no universally best harness; model-specific tuning matters.
- –The framework could improve agent evaluation, harness design, and training for tool-use reliability.
DISCOVERED
1h ago
2026-10-27
PUBLISHED
1h ago
2026-10-27
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
Discover AI