ECCV author questions 1-to-4 rebuttal swing
Reddit post from r/MachineLearning where an author describes receiving mixed ECCV reviews and worries that one reviewer gave a 1 while suggesting more experiments could change the score. The discussion is really about rebuttal strategy, reviewer flexibility, and whether it is worth pushing hard for a rating change during the response period.
Hot take: a big score swing is possible, but it is not something to assume or optimize your sanity around.
- –Reviewers can and do revise scores after rebuttal if you directly address the main technical concern.
- –A note like “I could change my assessment” usually means the reviewer is open to persuasion, not that they are committing to a jump from reject to accept.
- –The practical goal is to remove the specific objection that drove the 1, not to chase an exact target score.
- –This kind of thread is common in conference-review cycles: authors feel the pressure, but the outcome depends on whether the rebuttal materially changes the reviewer’s confidence.
DISCOVERED
4h ago
2026-05-08
PUBLISHED
7h ago
2026-05-08
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
Alternative_Art2984