Shortcut Auditing Exposes Agent-Safety Gaps
Hasan Demirkiran and Jens Ernstberger introduce a three-level framework for detecting shortcut reliance in agent-safety evaluations. Tests across LinuxArena, AgentDojo-Traj, and AgentHarm-Traj show that benchmark labels and guard decisions can depend heavily on artifacts such as command length, tool identity, formatting, and provenance markers.
This paper makes a strong case that agent-safety scores are only as trustworthy as the evaluation design behind them.
- –Simple cues reach 0.910 AUC on LinuxArena, while exact-tool lookup collapses from F1 .901 to .495 under domain holdout
- –AgentHarm-Traj performance falls from F1 .902 to .719 when weighting interactions equally instead of individual steps
- –Rewriting an untrusted-content marker changed Claude Haiku’s blocking rate by 8.33 percentage points, while opaque tool aliases shifted it by 11.46 points
- –The effects were configuration-specific and did not reproduce consistently on Luna or a deterministic TS-Guard reproduction
- –Developers should add group holdouts, unit-balanced metrics, paired perturbations, and formatting placebos to safety evaluations
DISCOVERED
56m ago
2026-10-16
PUBLISHED
1h ago
2026-10-16
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
arnaudmercier