Qwen3.5-4B Counts Better With Thinking
A local Ollama test shows Qwen3.5-4B giving inconsistent character counts until thinking mode prompts it to spell out the target word, producing five correct answers. The demo highlights how explicit intermediate reasoning can improve reliability even in a compact model.
The result is a useful prompting lesson, not evidence of universal counting competence.
- –Thinking mode turns a brittle visual or character-counting task into a more reliable sequential process
- –At 4B parameters, Qwen3.5-4B offers an unusually capable local, open-weight option for experimentation
- –The improvement comes with added latency and token usage, making thinking best reserved for error-prone tasks
- –Five successful trials are encouraging but too small to qualify as a robust benchmark
- –Developers should pair model reasoning with deterministic code when exact counting matters
DISCOVERED
32m ago
2026-11-11
PUBLISHED
35m ago
2026-11-11
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
DIY Smart Code