BACK_TO_FEEDAICRIER_2
GPT-5.5 Edges Mythos in Cyber Eval
OPEN_SOURCE ↗
REDDIT · REDDIT// 2h agoBENCHMARK RESULT

GPT-5.5 Edges Mythos in Cyber Eval

UK AISI says GPT-5.5 slightly outperformed Anthropic’s Mythos Preview on a multi-step cyber-attack simulation, with a higher expert-level pass rate in its latest evaluation. In one challenge, AISI says a human expert needed roughly 12 hours, while GPT-5.5 finished in 10 minutes 22 seconds for $1.73 in API usage.

// ANALYSIS

This is less a brag about benchmark vanity and more a warning that frontier models are now compressing expert cyber workflows into minutes. The real story is the speedup: once agents can chain tools, reason through multi-step tasks, and operate cheaply, both defenders and attackers get a materially different cost curve.

  • AISI’s writeup puts GPT-5.5 ahead of Mythos Preview, GPT-5.4, and Opus 4.7 on expert-level cyber tasks, but the margin is small; the bigger signal is how high the ceiling already is.
  • The 12-hour-to-10-minute gap matters more than the exact pass-rate delta because it shows how quickly model-assisted exploit research can scale.
  • NCSC’s companion guidance is consistent with this trend: defenders should assume attackers can already use capable AI and should adopt the same tools for detection, patching, and remediation.
  • This is still a simulated evaluation, not proof of real-world end-to-end compromise at scale, but it strongly suggests security teams need stronger monitoring and faster response loops now.
// TAGS
gpt-5.5llmbenchmarkagentsafetyreasoning

DISCOVERED

2h ago

2026-04-30

PUBLISHED

4h ago

2026-04-30

RELEVANCE

9/ 10

AUTHOR

socoolandawesome