CVPR workshop faces backlash over mandatory citation demands
A Reddit discussion in r/MachineLearning alleges the PHAROS-AIF-MIH CVPR 2026 challenge requires participants to cite 13 organizer papers, even when not directly relevant, and to upload papers to arXiv for eligibility. The post frames this as possible citation farming and raises concerns about research ethics in workshop competitions.
This is less about one workshop and more about growing pressure points in academic incentive systems.
- –Mandatory citation bundles tied to challenge entry can distort scholarly norms if references are not genuinely relevant.
- –Requiring arXiv uploads for participation can boost visibility, but combined with forced citations it looks extractive.
- –Community scrutiny on public forums is often the fastest accountability mechanism for workshop policy concerns.
- –If confirmed, organizers and conference governance bodies may need clearer anti-coercive citation rules.
DISCOVERED
75d ago
2026-03-14
PUBLISHED
76d ago
2026-03-12
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
ade17_in