YOU ARE VIEWING ONE ITEM FROM THE AICRIER FEED

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Q4_K_M posts solid CPU evals

AICrier tracks AI developer news across Product Hunt, GitHub, Hacker News, YouTube, X, arXiv, and more. This page keeps the article you opened front and center while giving you a path into the live feed.

// WHAT AICRIER DOES

7+

TRACKED FEEDS

24/7

SCRAPED FEED

Short summaries, external links, screenshots, relevance scoring, tags, and featured picks for AI builders.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Q4_K_M posts solid CPU evals
OPEN LINK ↗
// 45d agoBENCHMARK RESULT

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B Q4_K_M posts solid CPU evals

This is a CPU-only evaluation of the Q4_K_M GGUF quantization of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, run via `llama-cpp-python` on 32 vCPUs and 125 GB RAM. Across 1,264 samples, it scored 47.56% on HumanEval, 74.30% on HellaSwag, and 46.00% on BFCL, with reported throughput of 22 tokens/sec.

// ANALYSIS

The headline result is that a 35B/3B MoE model stays quite usable after quantization on CPU, but the weaknesses show up exactly where you’d expect: precise code and tool-use tasks degrade faster than broad commonsense reasoning.

  • 22 tokens/sec on a no-GPU host is the real story here; this is practical enough for local experimentation and some interactive workflows.
  • HellaSwag at 74.3% suggests the quant preserves general language competence better than task-specific exactness.
  • HumanEval at 47.56% and BFCL at 46% imply that quantization still hurts structured output and function-calling reliability.
  • The setup matters: this is a realistic local deployment path, not a cherry-picked GPU benchmark.
  • The eval is useful as a deployment signal for people deciding whether Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is viable on commodity CPU infrastructure.
// TAGS
qwen3.6-35b-a3bbenchmarkinferencellmopen-weightsself-hostedai-coding

DISCOVERED

45d ago

2026-04-18

PUBLISHED

45d ago

2026-04-18

RELEVANCE

9/ 10

AUTHOR

gvij