YOU ARE VIEWING ONE ITEM FROM THE AICRIER FEED

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B thinking mode trails GPT-OSS

AICrier tracks AI developer news across Product Hunt, GitHub, Hacker News, YouTube, X, arXiv, and more. This page keeps the article you opened front and center while giving you a path into the live feed.

// WHAT AICRIER DOES

7+

TRACKED FEEDS

24/7

SCRAPED FEED

Short summaries, external links, screenshots, relevance scoring, tags, and featured picks for AI builders.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B thinking mode trails GPT-OSS
OPEN LINK ↗
// 65d agoBENCHMARK RESULT

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B thinking mode trails GPT-OSS

On a roughly 17k-character tagging prompt, a Reddit user reports GPT-OSS-120B finishing in about 25 seconds while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B took more than four minutes. The likely culprit is Qwen3.5’s default thinking mode, which can add a long reasoning pass before the final answer.

// ANALYSIS

This smells like a reasoning-budget problem, not a bandwidth problem: Qwen3.5’s default thinking pass can dominate wall time on easy extraction jobs.

  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is a 122B-parameter MoE with 10B activated, so raw tok/s can look fine even when extra reasoning tokens inflate end-to-end latency.
  • The model card explicitly says thinking is on by default and documents a non-thinking configuration, which is the lever you want for low-latency pipelines.
  • For tagging and other narrow extraction tasks, benchmark thinking and non-thinking modes separately; otherwise you’re measuring reasoning budget, not just model quality.
  • If latency is the blocker, GPT-OSS-120B is probably the safer fast-path default, while Qwen3.5 stays the better choice for harder prompts.
// TAGS
qwen3.5-122b-a10bgpt-oss-120bllmreasoninginferencebenchmarkopen-weights

DISCOVERED

65d ago

2026-03-24

PUBLISHED

65d ago

2026-03-23

RELEVANCE

7/ 10

AUTHOR

florinandrei