DeepSeek V4 Pro beats GPT-5.5 Pro on precision
RuntimeWire's head-to-head evaluation comparing DeepSeek V4 Pro and GPT-5.5 Pro ended in a 38.0 to 33.0 victory for DeepSeek. The model showed strict compliance with schemas and constraints, whereas GPT-5.5 Pro struggled with avoidable deviations like breaking structured JSON schemas.
DeepSeek V4 Pro's rigid instruction following gives it a major edge for structured developer tasks, while GPT-5.5 Pro's tendency to improvise can break production applications.
- –DeepSeek V4 Pro won the coding task (python-log-redactor) by correctly combining regex patterns into a single replacer, avoiding potential ordering bugs that GPT-5.5 Pro's multi-regex solution introduced.
- –In vendor-delay-update, DeepSeek V4 Pro adhered closely to constraints without adding unnecessary handoff/escalation details or changing the recipient to a different department like GPT-5.5 Pro did.
- –GPT-5.5 Pro failed the structured schema constraints of the meeting-notes-summary task by introducing extra text to launch_date and formatting blocked_by as an array instead of a single value.
- –The models tied on the simpler messy-orders-to-json task, showing they are equally capable of standard data normalization tasks.
DISCOVERED
2h ago
2026-06-08
PUBLISHED
5h ago
2026-06-08
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
yogthos