OPEN_SOURCE ↗
REDDIT · REDDIT// 4h agoINFRASTRUCTURE
RFQ extraction exposes local LLM limits
A LocalLLaMA user is trying to turn mixed RFQ files into Markdown, then use a locally hosted LLM in LM Studio to extract structured JSON. The thread is less a product announcement than a practical warning: small local models on 8GB GPUs struggle with long, messy, tabular business documents.
// ANALYSIS
The smart move here is to stop treating the LLM as the whole parser and use it only after deterministic extraction, chunking, schema validation, and retry loops have done most of the work.
- –RFQ extraction usually needs layout-aware parsing for tables, not just Markdown conversion plus a prompt
- –Smaller local models can miss fields, hallucinate structure, or degrade on long context, especially on consumer GPUs
- –A production pipeline should combine OCR/table extraction, field normalization, constrained JSON output, validation, and human review for low-confidence cases
- –The privacy case for local inference is real, but the economics may favor cloud or larger hosted models if throughput and accuracy matter
// TAGS
lm-studiollmdata-toolsgpuself-hostedautomation
DISCOVERED
4h ago
2026-04-23
PUBLISHED
6h ago
2026-04-23
RELEVANCE
5/ 10
AUTHOR
Impressive_Refuse_75