BACK_TO_FEEDAICRIER_2
Mac users see Qwen3.5 GGUF outrun MLX
OPEN_SOURCE ↗
REDDIT · REDDIT// 25d agoBENCHMARK RESULT

Mac users see Qwen3.5 GGUF outrun MLX

A LocalLLaMA user with an M3 Ultra Mac Studio (512GB) reports much faster prompt processing and steadier token generation using Qwen3.5 GGUF models in llama.cpp versus MLX for long-context, agentic coding tasks. The post says llama.cpp prompt caching feels more reliable in real multi-file workflows and asks the community for corrections and better tuning advice.

// ANALYSIS

This reads less like “MLX is bad” and more like a practical warning that long-context runtime behavior matters more than peak tokens-per-second claims.

  • The benchmark scenario is developer-realistic (multi-file coding, debugging, MCP/tool calls), where prefill speed and cache reuse dominate perceived responsiveness.
  • Recent llama.cpp hybrid-cache updates (including checkpointing controls) indicate rapid iteration on Qwen3.5 long-context pain points.
  • Some full reprocessing behavior appears linked to hybrid/recurrent-memory constraints and changing prompt prefixes, so client prompt construction can materially affect results.
  • For Mac workflows, a two-model strategy (faster 35B for iteration, larger 122B for final quality) is emerging as a pragmatic pattern.
// TAGS
qwen3.5llminferencebenchmarkai-codingmcpself-hostedopen-source

DISCOVERED

25d ago

2026-03-17

PUBLISHED

25d ago

2026-03-17

RELEVANCE

8/ 10

AUTHOR

BitXorBit