Claude Haiku 5.5 Wins Cheap Coding Test
A DIY Smart Code comparison found Claude Haiku 5.5 completed an Express bug-fix task in every run for roughly $0.20, versus $0.76 on Sonnet 5.5 and $1.53 on Opus 5.5. The result supports Anthropic’s positioning of Haiku 5.5 as a cost-efficient model for high-volume coding and subagent workloads. Anthropic.
Haiku 5.5 looks like the practical default for routine coding agents, though one Express task cannot establish broad model superiority.
- –The test shows a roughly 74% savings versus Sonnet 5.5 and 87% versus Opus 5.5.
- –Its strongest use case is delegated work where success matters more than maximum reasoning depth.
- –Developers should validate performance across repositories, languages, edge cases, and regression-heavy tasks.
- –Costs can rise sharply once prompts exceed 100,000 tokens, where Haiku 5.5 uses higher pricing tiers. Pricing documentation.
- –Adjustable effort settings give teams another way to trade off latency, quality, and spend. Model documentation.
DISCOVERED
1h ago
2026-10-18
PUBLISHED
1h ago
2026-10-18
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
DIY Smart Code