New Paper Steers LLM Tool-Call Rates
This training-free method uses a residual-stream direction to tune LLM tool-call rates from near 0% to over 90% without changing prompts or model weights. On PopQA, selective steering raised live-search accuracy from 0.29 to 0.56 at roughly 1.1 searches per question.
This is a compelling inference-time control knob for agent cost and reliability, though it is closer to behavioral steering than a complete tool-use policy.
- –Difference-of-means activation vectors are extracted from the model’s own tool-use propensity signal, requiring no fine-tuning, labels, gradients, or prompt changes.
- –A shared direction generalizes across six unseen tools while primarily changing whether the model calls something—not which tool it selects.
- –Induced calls concentrate on obscure questions the model is unlikely to know, producing a useful cost–accuracy Pareto frontier.
- –The approach transfers across dense, MoE, and multimodal models, but strong positive steering can create malformed calls and does not improve tool-execution quality.
- –The authors publicly release implementation code at [GitHub](https://github.com/YuqiChen4188/Steering-Tool-Use-Propensity).
DISCOVERED
1d ago
2026-08-28
PUBLISHED
1d ago
2026-08-28
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
Discover AI