OpenAI unveils CoT-Control safety eval
OpenAI published a new research paper and eval suite called CoT-Control to measure whether reasoning models can deliberately shape or suppress their chain-of-thought traces. The early result is encouraging for AI safety: current reasoning models appear much worse at controlling their internal reasoning than at controlling final answers, so CoT monitoring still looks useful as an oversight signal.
This is one of the more important safety papers of the week because it turns a vague fear—models hiding their reasoning—into a concrete benchmark with surprisingly low current scores.
- –CoT-Control pairs real benchmark tasks with explicit constraints on the reasoning trace, such as avoiding key words or changing style, to test whether a model can solve the task while masking how it thinks.
- –The paper covers more than 14,000 tasks drawn from benchmarks like GPQA, MMLU-Pro, HLE, BFCL, and SWE-Bench Verified, which makes it much more substantive than a toy safety demo.
- –OpenAI says GPT-5.4 Thinking controls only about 0.3% of 10k-character chains of thought, close to GPT-5.2 Thinking at 0.2%, suggesting better reasoning did not obviously make hidden reasoning easier.
- –The broader research result is more nuanced: controllability rises with model size, but falls with more RL reasoning training, more test-time compute, and harder tasks, so this is not a permanently solved problem.
- –For developers building agent systems, the practical takeaway is that reasoning traces remain a useful monitoring surface today, but labs now need to track this metric continuously as models get more situationally aware.
DISCOVERED
83d ago
2026-03-06
PUBLISHED
84d ago
2026-03-05
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
likeastar20