OpenAI Claims ETH False, Publishes Lean Proof
OpenAI’s models claim to refute the Exponential Time Hypothesis with a subexponential SAT algorithm, alongside a public Lean formalization. The result is now entering expert review led by Russell Impagliazzo, Ramamohan Paturi, and Ryan Williams.
If the claim survives scrutiny, it would reshape theoretical computer science—but it remains an extraordinary, independently unverified result rather than settled fact.
- –The claimed bound is subexponential, not polynomial, so it refutes ETH without resolving P versus NP.
- –ETH supports hundreds of conditional lower bounds across graph algorithms, databases, geometry, and computational biology.
- –Lean checks formal derivations, but reviewers must verify that the formal statement and complexity model faithfully capture standard ETH.
- –No immediate practical speedup follows; translating the asymptotic result into useful algorithms will require substantial work.
- –The public artifacts and expert-led review make this a significant test of AI-generated research verification.
DISCOVERED
1h ago
2026-10-27
PUBLISHED
4h ago
2026-10-26
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
vok