Deepgram beats ElevenLabs, AssemblyAI in Swedish diarization
On a real 2h22m Swedish meeting with six speakers, Deepgram delivered the best diarization balance: 92%+ accuracy, full speaker coverage, and much faster turnaround than AssemblyAI. ElevenLabs' Swedish transcription sounded cleaner, but its diarization missed two speakers outright.
This is the kind of benchmark that matters because it tests a real long-form meeting, not a synthetic clip. For multilingual voice apps, the winning stack is often the one that separates transcription quality from speaker separation instead of trying to make one vendor do both.
- –Deepgram was the only option here to keep all 6 speakers and stay around 92% diarization accuracy while finishing in under a minute.
- –ElevenLabs' Swedish text quality looks better in practice, but 32.8% time accuracy and 4/6 speakers make its diarizer a no-go for serious meeting apps.
- –AssemblyAI is close on raw accuracy, but 218-303 second runtimes are hard to justify when latency matters.
- –PyannoteAI Precision-2 may look stronger on paper, but async, job-based execution pushes it out of the usable-now bucket for real-time or near-real-time pipelines.
- –The practical play is a hybrid pipeline: use one model for Swedish transcription, another for diarization, then align the outputs downstream.
DISCOVERED
60d ago
2026-03-29
PUBLISHED
60d ago
2026-03-29
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
invismanfow
