YOU ARE VIEWING ONE ITEM FROM THE AICRIER FEED

Jake Benchmark v1 crowns Qwen3.5 27B

AICrier tracks AI developer news across Product Hunt, GitHub, Hacker News, YouTube, X, arXiv, and more. This page keeps the article you opened front and center while giving you a path into the live feed.

// WHAT AICRIER DOES

7+

TRACKED FEEDS

24/7

SCRAPED FEED

Short summaries, external links, screenshots, relevance scoring, tags, and featured picks for AI builders.

Jake Benchmark v1 crowns Qwen3.5 27B
OPEN LINK ↗
// 66d agoBENCHMARK RESULT

Jake Benchmark v1 crowns Qwen3.5 27B

Jake Benchmark v1 ran 7 local models through 22 real agent tasks on OpenClaw and Ollama, using a Raspberry Pi 5 and an RTX 3090. Qwen3.5:27b-q4_K_M won decisively at 59.4%, while the 35B runner-up stalled at 23.2% and the rest mostly flopped.

// ANALYSIS

The real takeaway is that local agent quality still depends more on tool discovery and execution discipline than on raw parameter count. A quantized 27B beating a 35B by 2.5x is a loud reminder that "bigger" is often the wrong instinct for agent workloads.

  • Medium thinking was the sweet spot for the winner; higher reasoning hurt, which suggests agent loops need crisp tool selection, not endless deliberation.
  • Models that found the `gog` CLI did the work; models that couldn't discover it mostly died under 5%, making tool surfacing the biggest bottleneck.
  • Browser automation was a complete bust across the board, so end-to-end UI agents still need more than a good language model.
  • Security behavior was all over the place, from clean phishing refusal to reckless secret probing, so guardrails can't rely on model instinct alone.
  • OpenClaw advertises Gmail, GitHub, and browser integrations ([openclaw.ai](https://openclaw.ai/)), but this benchmark suggests the model remains the limiting layer.
// TAGS
jake-benchmarkopenclawbenchmarkllmagentautomationclicomputer-use

DISCOVERED

66d ago

2026-03-23

PUBLISHED

67d ago

2026-03-23

RELEVANCE

8/ 10

AUTHOR

Emergency_Ant_843