Open-weights models struggle with rigid developer instructions
A developer using the minimalist Pi Coding Agent and Ollama Cloud reports significant issues getting open-weights models like Kimi K2.5, GLM 5.1, and MiniMax M2.7 to follow project-level rules for dependency management and comment formatting. The struggles highlight a persistent gap in instruction-following capabilities between frontier models and open-weights alternatives.
This is a classic "vibe coding" vs "engineering" clash — open-weights and mid-tier models often collapse under the weight of strict negative constraints and formatting rules.
- –The highly specific comment style rules (imperative mood, specific punctuation per line type) are notoriously difficult for smaller models, which tend to revert to their pre-training distributions
- –Pi Coding Agent relies entirely on standard Markdown files like `AGENTS.md` to steer behavior, meaning success depends completely on the underlying model's system prompt compliance
- –While models like Kimi and GLM are improving at coding logic, they still trail behind GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet in rigid adherence to multi-part instructions
- –The thread underscores that high "reasoning" settings do not automatically translate to high instruction fidelity
DISCOVERED
46d ago
2026-04-13
PUBLISHED
46d ago
2026-04-13
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
FrostyCurrent