BACK_TO_FEEDAICRIER_2
OpenCode benchmark favors Qwen, Gemma
OPEN_SOURCE ↗
REDDIT · REDDIT// 5d agoBENCHMARK RESULT

OpenCode benchmark favors Qwen, Gemma

This post compares self-hosted LLMs inside OpenCode across an easy CLI build task and a harder site-migration mapping task. On the author’s RTX 4080 setup, Qwen 3.5 27B and Gemma 4 26B came out strongest overall, with several other models trailing on either quality, speed, or both.

// ANALYSIS

Useful, practical signal for anyone trying to run an agentic coding stack locally: the best model on paper is not always the best model in OpenCode, where tool use, consistency, and latency all matter.

  • Qwen 3.5 looks like the safest all-around pick for 16GB VRAM hardware, especially when you want decent quality without brutal slowdown
  • Gemma 4 26B is the surprise contender here; it appears competitive enough that it deserves a longer local-coding trial
  • GLM-4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 seem to struggle more on the harder, structured task, which is usually where agent workflows expose weak reasoning or instruction-following
  • The 25k-50k context range is a reminder that real agent use is not a toy benchmark; model behavior can change a lot once prompts and repo context get large
  • The speed table matters as much as the task results, because local coding agents become frustrating fast once throughput drops below interactive
// TAGS
opencodebenchmarkai-codingllmself-hostedclitesting

DISCOVERED

5d ago

2026-04-06

PUBLISHED

6d ago

2026-04-06

RELEVANCE

8/ 10

AUTHOR

rosaccord