YOU ARE VIEWING ONE ITEM FROM THE AICRIER FEED

OpenCode benchmark favors Qwen, Gemma

AICrier tracks AI developer news across Product Hunt, GitHub, Hacker News, YouTube, X, arXiv, and more. This page keeps the article you opened front and center while giving you a path into the live feed.

// WHAT AICRIER DOES

7+

TRACKED FEEDS

24/7

SCRAPED FEED

Short summaries, external links, screenshots, relevance scoring, tags, and featured picks for AI builders.

OpenCode benchmark favors Qwen, Gemma
OPEN LINK ↗
// 51d agoBENCHMARK RESULT

OpenCode benchmark favors Qwen, Gemma

This post compares self-hosted LLMs inside OpenCode across an easy CLI build task and a harder site-migration mapping task. On the author’s RTX 4080 setup, Qwen 3.5 27B and Gemma 4 26B came out strongest overall, with several other models trailing on either quality, speed, or both.

// ANALYSIS

Useful, practical signal for anyone trying to run an agentic coding stack locally: the best model on paper is not always the best model in OpenCode, where tool use, consistency, and latency all matter.

  • Qwen 3.5 looks like the safest all-around pick for 16GB VRAM hardware, especially when you want decent quality without brutal slowdown
  • Gemma 4 26B is the surprise contender here; it appears competitive enough that it deserves a longer local-coding trial
  • GLM-4.7 Flash and Nemotron 3 seem to struggle more on the harder, structured task, which is usually where agent workflows expose weak reasoning or instruction-following
  • The 25k-50k context range is a reminder that real agent use is not a toy benchmark; model behavior can change a lot once prompts and repo context get large
  • The speed table matters as much as the task results, because local coding agents become frustrating fast once throughput drops below interactive
// TAGS
opencodebenchmarkai-codingllmself-hostedclitesting

DISCOVERED

51d ago

2026-04-06

PUBLISHED

51d ago

2026-04-06

RELEVANCE

8/ 10

AUTHOR

rosaccord