OPEN LINK ↗
// 45d agoOPENSOURCE RELEASE
AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, WRITING.md target AI slop
Two small rule sets, one for coding agents and one for LLM-assisted writing, try to solve the same recurring problem: models acting too fast, too broadly, or too confidently. The coding file pushes repo-first investigation, tight scope, and verification; the writing file trims filler, fake specificity, and other AI-slop tells.
// ANALYSIS
The useful part not novelty in file naming, it’s discipline: evidence before edits, narrow changes, and no “done” claims without checks.
- –The coding rules directly attack the most common agent failure mode: jumping into code before the repo is understood and then sprawling into adjacent files
- –The emphasis on real verification and explicit parallel work is especially relevant for open-weight models, which usually need more structure to stay grounded
- –WRITING.md is a good mirror image of the coding rules: it treats prose like an engineering artifact, with clear bans on filler, repetitive cadence, and over-polished vagueness
- –These repos are most valuable as defaults you can adapt, not as a universal doctrine; the best parts are the concrete failure cases they encode
// TAGS
agents-mdclaude-mdwriting-mdai-codingagentprompt-engineeringopen-source
DISCOVERED
45d ago
2026-04-24
PUBLISHED
45d ago
2026-04-24
RELEVANCE
8/ 10
AUTHOR
Anbeeld