BACK_TO_FEEDAICRIER_2
AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, WRITING.md target AI slop
OPEN_SOURCE ↗
REDDIT · REDDIT// 5h agoOPENSOURCE RELEASE

AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, WRITING.md target AI slop

Two small rule sets, one for coding agents and one for LLM-assisted writing, try to solve the same recurring problem: models acting too fast, too broadly, or too confidently. The coding file pushes repo-first investigation, tight scope, and verification; the writing file trims filler, fake specificity, and other AI-slop tells.

// ANALYSIS

The useful part not novelty in file naming, it’s discipline: evidence before edits, narrow changes, and no “done” claims without checks.

  • The coding rules directly attack the most common agent failure mode: jumping into code before the repo is understood and then sprawling into adjacent files
  • The emphasis on real verification and explicit parallel work is especially relevant for open-weight models, which usually need more structure to stay grounded
  • WRITING.md is a good mirror image of the coding rules: it treats prose like an engineering artifact, with clear bans on filler, repetitive cadence, and over-polished vagueness
  • These repos are most valuable as defaults you can adapt, not as a universal doctrine; the best parts are the concrete failure cases they encode
// TAGS
agents-mdclaude-mdwriting-mdai-codingagentprompt-engineeringopen-source

DISCOVERED

5h ago

2026-04-24

PUBLISHED

7h ago

2026-04-24

RELEVANCE

8/ 10

AUTHOR

Anbeeld