LocalLLaMA weighs llama.cpp coding clients

The real story is that local coding agents are still gated more by model behavior than by client branding. If the model cannot reliably honor file-edit and tool-call formats, every agent workflow starts to feel brittle.

• –Continue has explicit `provider: llama.cpp` support in its docs, so it is the most straightforward local-first fit.
• –Cline can work locally, but its guidance emphasizes that smaller models often break on tool outputs and context handling.
• –opencode is model-agnostic and local-model friendly, which makes it a strong terminal option for llama.cpp users.
• –The thread's only reply points to OpenCode and Zed's agent, hinting that many users still prefer lightweight terminal-centric workflows.