A Hacker News thread debates whether corporate software engineering roles at large companies are primarily performative.
A software engineer on Hacker News questions if the majority of software engineering jobs at large corporations, including FAANG companies, are performative rather than productive. The author observes that most team members engage in low-value activities designed to impress management, while only a few key developers do the actual work. Additionally, they criticize manager schedules filled entirely with one-on-one meetings as having little value, leading to a demoralizing environment of "office workers cosplaying as engineers."
Corporate software engineering roles inevitably skew toward performance art because large organizations are optimized for predictability and consensus rather than individual developer efficiency.
* Metric-driven performance reviews reward high-visibility, easily-quantifiable actions over quiet, essential maintenance or complex bug fixing.
* Massive scaling creates layers of coordination overhead, transforming engineering roles into communication-heavy alignment tasks.
* A lack of clear technical ownership leads to redundant efforts and "busywork" designed to justify headcount.
DISCOVERED
52d ago
2026-06-10
PUBLISHED
52d ago
2026-06-10
RELEVANCE
AUTHOR
hnthrow10282910